Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Harp.io’s competitors in the Static Site Publisher category are AMP with 94.14%, Hugo with 5.24%, Jekyll with 0.43% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
AMP | 222346 | 94.14% | Harp.io vs AMP |
Hugo | 12375 | 5.24% | Harp.io vs Hugo |
Jekyll | 1010 | 0.43% | Harp.io vs Jekyll |
KeystoneJS | 176 | 0.07% | Harp.io vs KeystoneJS |
Surge | 111 | 0.05% | Harp.io vs Surge |
Divshot | 39 | 0.02% | Harp.io vs Divshot |
Paperplane.io | 20 | 0.01% | Harp.io vs Paperplane.io |
Aerobatic | 19 | 0.01% | Harp.io vs Aerobatic |
Apache Forrest | 13 | 0.01% | Harp.io vs Apache Forrest |
GitLab Pages | 13 | 0.01% | Harp.io vs GitLab Pages |
Ruhoh | 11 | 0.00% | Harp.io vs Ruhoh |
Middleman | 10 | 0.00% | Harp.io vs Middleman |
Phenomic | 8 | 0.00% | Harp.io vs Phenomic |
Metalsmith | 7 | 0.00% | Harp.io vs Metalsmith |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Harp.io’s competitors in the Static Site Publisher category are AMP with 94.14%, Hugo with 5.24%, Jekyll with 0.43% market share.
Harp.io vs AMP
Harp.io vs Hugo
Harp.io vs Jekyll
Harp.io vs KeystoneJS
Harp.io vs Surge
Harp.io vs Divshot
Harp.io vs Paperplane.io
Harp.io vs Aerobatic
Around the world in 2024, over 30 companies have started using Harp.io as Static Site Publisher tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sharp Decisions | 500 - 999 | New York City | New York | United States | |
Visual Studio Magazine | 100 - 249 | Irvine | California | United States | |
GDP Labs | 100 - 249 | Jakarta | Jakarta | Indonesia | |
InfoQ | 100 - 249 | Austin | Texas | United States | |
Botschaft Der Republik Polen | 50 - 99 | Berlin | Berlin | Germany | |
Alpem SA | 20 - 49 | Reims | Grand Est | France | |
Marina Regia Residence | 20 - 49 | Navodari | Constanta | Romania | |
DotNetKicks, LLC | 20 - 49 | Seattle | Washington | United States | |
Blot | 10 - 19 | Isle of Man | |||
The Ui Store Cazoobi Limited | 10 - 19 | North Shields | England | United Kingdom |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Harp.io for Static Site Publisher are Devops (2), .Net (2), Cloud Programming (1).
Customers
The majority of Harp.io's customers for the static-site-publisher category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (11 companies), 10 - 19 employees (8 companies), 20 - 49 employees (4 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Harp.io for static-site-publisher are the United States with 8(30.77%), France with 5(19.23%), United Kingdom with 3(11.54%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Harp.io competitors?
Harp.io’s Top competitors in the static-site-publisher category are AMP, Hugo, Jekyll. You can view a full list of Harp.io competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Harp.io and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Harp.io and its feature with top competitors here : Harp.io vs AMP Harp.io vs Hugo Harp.io vs Jekyll.
What is Harp.io customer distribution based on company size?
What is Harp.io market share in the static-site-publisher?
What are the top countries that use Harp.io?
What are the top industries that use Harp.io?
Justine Lyon
Senior VP of Sales, Ally
At my previous organization we used Zoominfo and LInkedIn Navigator for contact, Bombora for intent and DiscoverOrg for account info. When I joined Ally where we use 6sense, I found it to be as valuable as all the other tools combined!
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo