Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Commando.io’s competitors in the Secure Shell (SSH) category are WinSCP with 45.79%, PuTTY with 17.40%, MobaXTerm with 12.43% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| WinSCP | 3895 | 45.79% | Commando.io vs WinSCP |
| PuTTY | 1480 | 17.40% | Commando.io vs PuTTY |
| MobaXTerm | 1057 | 12.43% | Commando.io vs MobaXTerm |
| SecureCRT | 780 | 9.17% | Commando.io vs SecureCRT |
| OpenSSH | 629 | 7.39% | Commando.io vs OpenSSH |
| Azure Bastion | 489 | 5.75% | Commando.io vs Azure Bastion |
| AWS CloudShell | 69 | 0.81% | Commando.io vs AWS CloudShell |
| ManageEngine Key Manager Plus | 30 | 0.35% | Commando.io vs ManageEngine Key Manager Plus |
| Prompt | 27 | 0.32% | Commando.io vs Prompt |
| JuiceSSH | 21 | 0.25% | Commando.io vs JuiceSSH |
| SecureBridge | 7 | 0.08% | Commando.io vs SecureBridge |
| FireSSH | 7 | 0.08% | Commando.io vs FireSSH |
| Userify | 5 | 0.06% | Commando.io vs Userify |
| Ganymed SSH-2 | 4 | 0.05% | Commando.io vs Ganymed SSH-2 |
| Universal SSH Key Manager | 2 | 0.02% | Commando.io vs Universal SSH Key Manager |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Commando.io’s competitors in the Secure Shell (SSH) category are WinSCP with 45.79%, PuTTY with 17.40%, MobaXTerm with 12.43% market share.
Commando.io vs WinSCP
Commando.io vs PuTTY
Commando.io vs MobaXTerm
Commando.io vs SecureCRT
Commando.io vs OpenSSH
Commando.io vs Azure Bastion
Commando.io vs AWS CloudShell
Commando.io vs ManageEngine Key Manager Plus
Around the world in 2025, over 5 companies have started using Commando.io as Secure Shell (SSH) tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services | 10,000+ | Seattle | Washington | United States | |
| Ministerie Van Defensie | 10,000+ | The Hague | South Holland | Netherlands | |
| Red Kubes - Acquired By Akamai | 5,000 - 9,999 | Utrecht | Utrecht | Netherlands | |
| Rackspace Technology | 5,000 - 9,999 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | |
| SearchBlox | 20 - 49 | Glen Allen | Virginia | United States |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Commando.io for Secure Shell (SSH) are Developer Tools (1), Virtual Servers (1), Lucene (1).
Customers
The majority of Commando.io's customers for the secure-shell-ssh category fall in the company size of 5,000 - 9,999 employees (2 companies), 10,000+ employees (2 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Commando.io for secure-shell-ssh are the United States with 3(60.00%), Netherlands with 2(40.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Commando.io competitors?
Commando.io’s Top competitors in the secure-shell-ssh category are WinSCP, PuTTY, MobaXTerm. You can view a full list of Commando.io competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Commando.io and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Commando.io and its feature with top competitors here : Commando.io vs WinSCP Commando.io vs PuTTY Commando.io vs MobaXTerm.
What is Commando.io customer distribution based on company size?
What is Commando.io market share in the secure-shell-ssh?
What are the top countries that use Commando.io?
What are the top industries that use Commando.io?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo