Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Verne’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.83%, RabbitMQ with 28.72%, IBM MQ with 5.90% market share.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Kafka | 28740 | 39.83% | Verne vs Apache Kafka |
| RabbitMQ | 20725 | 28.72% | Verne vs RabbitMQ |
| IBM MQ | 4257 | 5.90% | Verne vs IBM MQ |
| Apache ActiveMQ | 4115 | 5.70% | Verne vs Apache ActiveMQ |
| Realtime Framework | 3984 | 5.52% | Verne vs Realtime Framework |
| Microsoft Azure Service Bus | 3246 | 4.50% | Verne vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus |
| Google Cloud Messaging | 2547 | 3.53% | Verne vs Google Cloud Messaging |
| Ably Realtime | 1120 | 1.55% | Verne vs Ably Realtime |
| ZeroMQ | 963 | 1.33% | Verne vs ZeroMQ |
| NServiceBus | 789 | 1.09% | Verne vs NServiceBus |
| Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) | 390 | 0.54% | Verne vs Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) |
| Gearman | 386 | 0.53% | Verne vs Gearman |
| Hornetq | 268 | 0.37% | Verne vs Hornetq |
| Eclipse Paho | 181 | 0.25% | Verne vs Eclipse Paho |
| NATS | 155 | 0.21% | Verne vs NATS |
| CloudAMQP | 110 | 0.15% | Verne vs CloudAMQP |
| Apache Qpid | 62 | 0.09% | Verne vs Apache Qpid |
| NSQ | 39 | 0.05% | Verne vs NSQ |
| Iron.io | 23 | 0.03% | Verne vs Iron.io |
| CloudKarafka | 19 | 0.03% | Verne vs CloudKarafka |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Verne’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.83%, RabbitMQ with 28.72%, IBM MQ with 5.90% market share.
Verne vs Apache Kafka
Verne vs RabbitMQ
Verne vs IBM MQ
Verne vs Apache ActiveMQ
Verne vs Realtime Framework
Verne vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus
Verne vs Google Cloud Messaging
Verne vs Ably Realtime
Around the world in 2026, over 4 companies have started using Verne as Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing tool.
| Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mqtt | 20 - 49 | Ranst | Flanders | Belgium | |
| Erlang | 20 - 49 | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden | |
| Capitalware | 0 - 9 | London | Ontario | Canada | |
| Evothings | 0 - 9 | Stockholm | Stockholm | Sweden |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Verne for Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing are Bluetooth Low Energy (1), Internet Of Things (1), Mobile Tools Development (1).
Customers
The majority of Verne's customers for the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category fall in the company size of 20 - 49 employees (2 companies), 0 - 9 employees (2 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Verne for queueing-messaging-and-background-processing are the Sweden with 2(50.00%), Belgium with 1(25.00%), Canada with 1(25.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Verne competitors?
Verne’s Top competitors in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, IBM MQ. You can view a full list of Verne competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Verne and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Verne and its feature with top competitors here : Verne vs Apache Kafka Verne vs RabbitMQ Verne vs IBM MQ.
What is Verne customer distribution based on company size?
What is Verne market share in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing?
What are the top countries that use Verne?
What are the top industries that use Verne?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo