IronMQ is the distributed systems together by providing a reliable way to communicate between services and components.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of IronMQ’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.80%, RabbitMQ with 28.24%, IBM MQ with 7.20% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Apache Kafka | 22449 | 39.80% | IronMQ vs Apache Kafka |
RabbitMQ | 15930 | 28.24% | IronMQ vs RabbitMQ |
IBM MQ | 4061 | 7.20% | IronMQ vs IBM MQ |
Apache ActiveMQ | 3240 | 5.74% | IronMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ |
Realtime Framework | 2916 | 5.17% | IronMQ vs Realtime Framework |
Microsoft Azure Service Bus | 2168 | 3.84% | IronMQ vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus |
Ably Realtime | 1325 | 2.35% | IronMQ vs Ably Realtime |
Google Cloud Messaging | 1251 | 2.22% | IronMQ vs Google Cloud Messaging |
ZeroMQ | 960 | 1.70% | IronMQ vs ZeroMQ |
NServiceBus | 704 | 1.25% | IronMQ vs NServiceBus |
Gearman | 402 | 0.71% | IronMQ vs Gearman |
Hornetq | 239 | 0.42% | IronMQ vs Hornetq |
Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) | 236 | 0.42% | IronMQ vs Amazon Simple Workflow Service (SWF) |
Eclipse Paho | 141 | 0.25% | IronMQ vs Eclipse Paho |
CloudAMQP | 95 | 0.17% | IronMQ vs CloudAMQP |
NATS | 64 | 0.11% | IronMQ vs NATS |
Apache Qpid | 63 | 0.11% | IronMQ vs Apache Qpid |
CloudMQTT | 33 | 0.06% | IronMQ vs CloudMQTT |
NSQ | 33 | 0.06% | IronMQ vs NSQ |
Iron.io | 27 | 0.05% | IronMQ vs Iron.io |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of IronMQ’s competitors in the Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing category are Apache Kafka with 39.80%, RabbitMQ with 28.24%, IBM MQ with 7.20% market share.
IronMQ vs Apache Kafka
IronMQ vs RabbitMQ
IronMQ vs IBM MQ
IronMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ
IronMQ vs Realtime Framework
IronMQ vs Microsoft Azure Service Bus
IronMQ vs Ably Realtime
IronMQ vs Google Cloud Messaging
Around the world in 2024, over 7 companies have started using IronMQ as Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diego Medina | 100 - 249 | Etowah | North Carolina | United States | |
Iron.io | 20 - 49 | San Francisco | California | United States | |
Fortrabbit | 0 - 9 | Berlin | Berlin | Germany | |
jsonapi.co | 0 - 9 | Wilmington | Delaware | United States | |
Cloud Infrastructure Services | 0 - 9 | Chalfont Saint Peter | England | United Kingdom | |
MetaClass | 0 - 9 | Groningen | Groningen | Netherlands | |
DayleRees | 0 - 9 | Aberystwyth | Wales | United Kingdom |
The top three products and services offering customers that use IronMQ for Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing are Docker (1), Platform As A Service (1), Azure Management (1).
Customers
The majority of IronMQ's customers for the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (5 companies), 100 - 249 employees (1 companies), 20 - 49 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of IronMQ for queueing-messaging-and-background-processing are the United States with 3(42.86%), United Kingdom with 2(28.57%), Netherlands with 1(14.29%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top IronMQ competitors?
IronMQ’s Top competitors in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing category are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, IBM MQ. You can view a full list of IronMQ competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of IronMQ and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare IronMQ and its feature with top competitors here : IronMQ vs Apache Kafka IronMQ vs RabbitMQ IronMQ vs IBM MQ.
What is IronMQ customer distribution based on company size?
What is IronMQ market share in the queueing-messaging-and-background-processing?
What are the top countries that use IronMQ?
What are the top industries that use IronMQ?
Justine Lyon
Senior VP of Sales, Ally
At my previous organization we used Zoominfo and LInkedIn Navigator for contact, Bombora for intent and DiscoverOrg for account info. When I joined Ally where we use 6sense, I found it to be as valuable as all the other tools combined!
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo