Categories where SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift compete
SAP Financials OnDemand
Comparing the customer bases of SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift, we can see that SAP Financials OnDemand has 951 customer(s), while Tradeshift has 160 customer(s). In the Accounts Receivable category, with 951 customer(s) SAP Financials OnDemand stands at 12th place by ranking, while Tradeshift with 160 customer(s), is at the 27th place.
SAP Financials OnDemand
12th
951 Customer
Tradeshift
27th
160 Customer
SAP Financials OnDemand has a 0.74% market share in the Accounts Receivable category, while Tradeshift has a 0.12% market share in the same space.
Comparing SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift customers based on their geographic location, we can see that SAP Financials OnDemand has more customers in United States, United Kingdom and Australia, while Tradeshift has more customers in United States.
SAP Financials OnDemand
Tradeshift
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of SAP Financials OnDemand vs Tradeshift’s target audience.
SAP Financials OnDemand
New
1 Customer
Lost
0 Customer
Tradeshift
New
1 Customer
Lost
2 Customer
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
What are the different markets in which SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift compete against each other?
SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift compete against each other in the Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Accounting, Billing And Invoicing, Budgeting And Forecasting.
How does the market share of SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift compare in the Accounts Receivable market?
How many customers are acquired by SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift in the Accounts Receivable segment?
What are the countries in which SAP Financials OnDemand and Tradeshift has more customers?
6Sense Chrome Extension
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.
Install Now